Does computer-aided detection have a role in the arbitration of discordant double-reading opinions in a breast-screening programme?

Does computer-aided detection have a role in the arbitration of discordant double-reading opinions in a breast-screening programme?
J.J. James, E.J. Cornford
Clinical Radiology (2009) 64, 46 - 51

Link to Journal

The main effect of CAD acting as an arbitrator of discordant double-reading opinions is to increase
the recall rate, significantly above what is found when arbitration is performed by an independent third reader. Using CAD as an arbitrator may be an option to deal with discordant double-reading opinions when no other method of consensus or arbitration is available