Image-guided breast biopsy: state-of-the-art
E.A.M. O'Flynn, A.R.M. Wilson, M.J. Michell
Clin Rad 65;4:259-270
Link to Journal
Review of breast biopsy by the King's team
Wednesday, 31 March 2010
Thursday, 25 March 2010
Criteria for the safe avoidance of needle sampling in young women with solid breast masses
Criteria for the safe avoidance of needle sampling in young women with solid breast masses
A.J. Maxwell, J.M. Pearson
Clinical Radiology 2010 65;3:218-222
Link to Journal
Nine women with breast cancer, seven with phyllodes, and six with papillomas were found.
No delayed diagnoses in those who had ultrasound would have been made if the following criteria had been applied to avoid needle sampling:
Needle sampling could have been safely avoided in approximately two-thirds of the women reviewed below the age of 25 with a solid breast mass
A.J. Maxwell, J.M. Pearson
Clinical Radiology 2010 65;3:218-222
Link to Journal
Nine women with breast cancer, seven with phyllodes, and six with papillomas were found.
No delayed diagnoses in those who had ultrasound would have been made if the following criteria had been applied to avoid needle sampling:
- age less than 25 years
- no known risk factors for breast malignancy
- mass not rapidly enlarging
- smooth discrete mobile mass on clinical examination, or lesion impalpable
- well-defined homogeneously isoechoic or mildly hypoechoic solid mass
- less than 3 cm in greatest dimension
- ovoid shape, aligned parallel to the skin surface
- smooth or gently lobulated contour (two or three lobulations only; no microlobulation
- thin echogenic pseudocapsule
- no calcification
- no acoustic shadowing
Needle sampling could have been safely avoided in approximately two-thirds of the women reviewed below the age of 25 with a solid breast mass
Labels:
benign masses,
core biopsy,
Needle biopsy,
under 25 years,
young women
Screening for breast cancer post reduction mammoplasty
Screening for breast cancer post reduction mammoplasty
T.M. Muir, J. Tresham, L. Fritschi, E. Wylie
Clinical Radiology 2010 65;3:198-205
Link to Journal
Postoperative breast changes following reduction mammoplasty do not significantly hinder analysis of the screening mammogram
T.M. Muir, J. Tresham, L. Fritschi, E. Wylie
Clinical Radiology 2010 65;3:198-205
Link to Journal
Postoperative breast changes following reduction mammoplasty do not significantly hinder analysis of the screening mammogram
Lesion size is a major determinant of the mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: findings from the Sloane project
Lesion size is a major determinant of the mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: findings from the Sloane project
A. Evans, K. Clements, A. Maxwell, H. Bishop, A. Hanby, G. Lawrence, S.E. Pinder
Clinical Radiology 2010 65;3:181-184
Link to Journal
Lesion size has a strong influence on the radiological features of calcific DCIS; small, high-grade lesions often show no casting calcifications, whereas casting calcifications are seen in nearly half of large, low-grade lesions. As small clusters of punctate or granular calcifications may represent high-grade DCIS, an aggressive clinical approach to the diagnosis of such lesions is recommended as the adequate treatment of high-grade DCIS will prevent the occurrence of potentially life-threatening high-grade invasive disease
A. Evans, K. Clements, A. Maxwell, H. Bishop, A. Hanby, G. Lawrence, S.E. Pinder
Clinical Radiology 2010 65;3:181-184
Link to Journal
Lesion size has a strong influence on the radiological features of calcific DCIS; small, high-grade lesions often show no casting calcifications, whereas casting calcifications are seen in nearly half of large, low-grade lesions. As small clusters of punctate or granular calcifications may represent high-grade DCIS, an aggressive clinical approach to the diagnosis of such lesions is recommended as the adequate treatment of high-grade DCIS will prevent the occurrence of potentially life-threatening high-grade invasive disease
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
